@article {Ismaile000626, author = {Tevfik F Ismail and Emma Cheasty and Laurence King and Sahar Naaseri and Olga Lazoura and Natalie Gartland and Simon Padley and Michael B Rubens and Isabel Castellano and Edward D Nicol}, title = {High-pitch versus conventional cardiovascular CT in patients being assessed for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a real-world appraisal}, volume = {4}, number = {2}, elocation-id = {e000626}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.1136/openhrt-2017-000626}, publisher = {Archives of Disease in childhood}, abstract = {Objective High-pitch protocols are increasingly used in cardiovascular CT assessment for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), but the impact on diagnostic image quality is not known.Methods We reviewed 95 consecutive TAVI studies: 44 (46\%) high-pitch and 51 (54\%) standard-pitch. Single high-pitch scans were performed regardless of heart rate. For standard-pitch acquisitions, a separate CT-aortogram and CT-coronary angiogram were performed with prospective gating, unless heart rate was >=70 beats/min, when retrospective gating was used. The aortic root and coronary arteries were assessed for artefact (significant artefact=1; artefact not limiting diagnosis=2; no artefact=3). Aortic scans were considered diagnostic if the score was \>1; the coronaries, if all three epicardial arteries scored \>1.Results There was no significant difference in diagnostic image quality for either the aorta (artefact-free high-pitch: 31 (73\%) scans vs standard-pitch: 40 (79\%), p=0.340) or the coronary tree as a whole (10 (23\%) vs 15 (29\%), p=0.493). However, proximal coronary arteries were less well visualised using high-pitch acquisitions (16 (36\%) vs 30 (59\%), p=0.04). The median (IQR) radiation dose was significantly lower in the high-pitch cohort (dose-length product: 347 (318{\textendash}476) vs 1227 (1150{\textendash}1474) mGy cm, respectively, p\<0.001), and the protocol required almost half the amount of contrast.Conclusions The high-pitch protocol significantly reduces radiation and contrast doses and is non-inferior to standard-pitch acquisitions for aortic assessment. For aortic root assessment, the high-pitch protocol is recommended. However, if coronary assessment is critical, this should be followed by a conventional standard-pitch, low-dose, prospectively gated CT-coronary angiogram if the high-pitch scan is non-diagnostic.}, URL = {https://openheart.bmj.com/content/4/2/e000626}, eprint = {https://openheart.bmj.com/content/4/2/e000626.full.pdf}, journal = {Open Heart} }