Objectives Severe psychological stress is generally associated with an increased risk of acute cardiovascular diseases, such as myocardial infarction, but it remains unknown whether it also applies to atrial fibrillation. We conducted a population-based case–control study using nationwide Danish health registers to examine the risk of atrial fibrillation after the death of a partner.
Methods From 1995 through 2014, we identified 88 612 cases with a hospital diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and 886 120 age-matched and sex-matched controls based on risk-set sampling. The conditional logistic regression model was used to calculate adjusted ORs of atrial fibrillation with 95% CIs.
Results Partner bereavement was experienced by 17 478 cases and 168 940 controls and was associated with a transiently higher risk of atrial fibrillation; the risk was highest 8–14 days after the loss (1.90; 95% CI 1.34 to 2.69), after which it gradually declined. One year after the loss, the risk was almost the same as in the non-bereaved population. Overall, the OR of atrial fibrillation within 30 days after bereavement was 1.41 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.70), but it tended to be higher in persons below the age of 60 years (2.34; 95% CI 1.02 to 5.40) and in persons whose partner had a low predicted mortality 1 month before the death, that is, ≤5 points on the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.57; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.17).
Conclusions The severely stressful life event of losing a partner was followed by a transiently increased risk of atrial fibrillation lasting for 1 year, especially for the least predicted losses.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
What is already known about this subject?
Previous studies have found that severely stressful life events increase the risk of cardiovascular events and case reports indicate emotional stress may be a triggering factor for arrhythmias. It remains unknown whether it also applies to risk of new onset of atrial fibrillation.
What does this study add?
This study found that the severely stressful life event of losing a partner was followed by an increased risk of atrial fibrillation lasting for 1 year. The risk was highest shortly after the loss and for the least predicted losses.
How might this impact on clinical practice?
These findings indicate that high levels of stress may increase the risk of developing new onset of atrial fibrillation. With a biologically plausible association early identification of this group should be encouraged and calls for further studies.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common cardiac arrhythmia in the western world. The estimated life-time risk varies between 22% and 26%, and AF is one of the few heart diseases with increasing incidence.1 AF is associated with increased risk of death,2 stroke3 and heart failure,4 but also with a lower health-related quality of life.5 The treatment and the potentially related complications pose a major economic burden on the healthcare system.6
Mounting evidence indicates that severely stressful life events increase the risk of acute cardiovascular events like myocardial infarction,7 but no large studies have examined whether the association also applies to AF or atrial flutter. A few studies suggest that emotional stress may be a triggering factor for arrhythmia in persons with paroxysmal AF,8 and case reports indicate that this may also concern patients with no former history of AF.9 Furthermore, studies suggest that high-impact stress may cause pathophysiological changes that make the heart more vulnerable to arrhythmias by reduced parasympathetic modulation,10 which may cause excessive sympathetic activity11 and stimulate proinflammatory cytokines.12
The loss of a partner is considered one of the most severely stressful life events13 and is likely to affect most people, independently of coping mechanisms. Bereavement often causes mental illness symptoms such as depression, anxiety, guilt, anger and hopelessness.14
In a large population-based case–control study, we examined the association between partner bereavement and the risk of new onset of AF while taking into account the time since bereavement, comorbidity and medication use.
We conducted a population-based case–control study from 1995 through 2014, using prospectively collected information from four nationwide Danish registries on the Danish population of 5.6 million inhabitants. The Danish national healthcare system provides free access (tax-funded) to healthcare and partial reimbursement for prescribed medications. The unique Danish civil registration number (CRN), which is assigned to all Danish residents at birth or immigration, allowed us to link data at the personal level across all registries. The CRN has been used in the Danish Civil Registration System15 since 1968 and contains information on residence, cohabitant status, educational level, marital status, spouse, migration, vital status and date of death. The Danish National Patient Register16 was established in 1977 and holds information on discharge diagnoses from all Danish hospitals, and data from emergency rooms and outpatient clinics has also been recorded since 1995. Diagnoses are coded in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases; the eight revision (ICD-8) was used from 1971 to 1993, while the 10th revision (ICD-10) has been used since 1993.
Cases with AF
Persons with a first-time inpatient diagnosis of AF (from 1995 through 2014) were identified using information from the Danish National Patient Register (ICD-8: 427.93, 427.94 and ICD-10: I48; atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter). Information on the combined diagnosis of AF and atrial flutter has proven to have a high validity (positive predictive value: 92.6%; 95% CI 88.8% to 95.2%) in the Danish National Patient Register17 and has previously been used in epidemiological studies.18 We considered the date of the first admission diagnosis of AF between 1995 through 2014 to be the index date for included cases. The Danish National Patient Register was used to exclude people diagnosed with a heart-valve disease before the index date (ICD-8: 394–396 and ICD-10: I05, I06, I08, I34 and I35).
For each case, we randomly selected 10 controls (1:10) matched on age (±2 months) and sex. These controls were assigned an index date identical to that of the AF diagnosis for the corresponding cases. All controls were selected through risk-set sampling from the population of all persons alive and living in Denmark with no personal history of AF at the index date according to the Danish Civil Registration System.
We used the Danish Civil Registration System to identify cohabitant partner status, marital status, identification of corresponding spouse or partner, and all spousal/partner deaths for cases and controls prior to the index date. We used the Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index19 (ACCI) to classify the likelihood of death for all partners 1 month before his or her death, with allocated points for selected chronic diseases obtained from the Danish National Patient Register (1 point: myocardial infarct, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, cerebrovascular disease, chronic lung disease, connective tissue disease, ulcer, chronic liver disease and/or diabetes; 2 points: hemiplegia, moderate or severe kidney disease, diabetes with end organ damage, tumour, leukaemia and/or lymphoma; 3 points: moderate or severe liver disease; 6 points: malignant tumour, metastasis and/or AIDS) and for age (1 point: 50–59 years; 2 points: 60–69 years; 3 points: 70–79 years; 4 points: 80–89 years; 5 points: 90–99 years).
Information on potential confounding factors was obtained from the Danish National Patient Register, the Danish National Diabetes Register,20 and the Danish National Prescription Register.21 Since 1990, the Danish National Diabetes Register has provided information on diabetes mellitus according to an algorithm developed on the basis of data from four nationwide Danish registers. Since 1995, complete computerised prescription records have been available in the Danish National Prescription Register; the database provides dispensing dates for all reimbursed drugs classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System.
From the Danish National Patient Register and the Danish National Diabetes Register, we obtained previous hospitalisation diagnoses on hypertension, ischaemic heart disease (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction and chronic ischaemic heart disease), cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, hyperthyroidism and diabetes mellitus, which may increase the risk of AF (see table 1). From the Danish National Prescription Register, we obtained information on used cardiovascular drugs classified according to ATC codes: vitamin K antagonists (MB01AA), ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II antagonists (MC09), β-blocking agents (MC07), lipid-modifying agents (MC10), calcium antagonists (MC08D), diuretics (MC03), nitrates (MC01DA), digoxin (MC01) and antiplatelet agents (MB01AC). Only prescriptions redeemed within 3 months before the index date were included. Maximum educational level was classified according to the United Nation's International Standard Classification of Education: low (<10 years), middle (10–15 years) and high (>15 years).22
We calculated ORs and 95% CIs of AF using conditional logistic regression comparing the risk among bereaved against the cohabitant group. As we used risk-set sampling of controls, the ORs present unbiased estimates of the corresponding incidence rate ratios.23 In multiple conditional logistic regression models, we controlled for the covariates listed in table 1.
First, we calculated the ORs for AF according to the time since bereavement, and these were grouped according to time period: 0–7 days, 8–14 days, 15–30 days, 31–90 days, 91–365 days, 366–1095 days and >1095 days before the index date.
Second, we calculated the ORs of developing AF within 30 days after bereavement in subgroups of the population categorised according to sex, age, calendar time, cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus.
Third, we evaluated whether the effect of bereavement on AF depended on the health status of the partner 1 month before death. This was measured by the ACCI scores divided into three categories: lowest risk of death (0–5 points), intermediate risk (6–8 points) and highest risk (9–16 points). The division was made prior to the analysis to establish as much power in each category as possible.
Fourth, we examined the effect of being single on AF risk compared with cohabitating partners.
Finally, we performed a subanalysis after excluding cases and the corresponding controls who redeemed a prescription of an antithrombotic agent (ATC: MB01AA) before the index date.
Analyses were performed using STATA, V.13; StatCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA.
More cases than controls had a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and/or hyperthyroidism and also received more medications for these conditions (table 1).
During the whole study period, partner bereavement was experienced by 17 478 (19.72%) cases and 168 940 (19.07%) controls; 144 cases and 1036 controls were bereaved within the past 30 days prior to AF. Bereavement was followed by a transiently higher risk of AF (figure 1). The OR was highest 8–14 days after the loss (1.90; 95% CI 1.34 to 2.69), after which it gradually declined. One year after the loss, it corresponded to a level close to that of the non-bereaved population (1.04; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.09).
Overall, the OR of developing AF within 30 days after bereavement was 41% higher (1.41; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.70) in the bereaved population compared with the non-bereaved population (figure 2). This risk was relatively constant over subgroups characterised by sex, calendar time, pre-existing cardiovascular disease and diabetes. The highest OR was found among persons below the age of 60 years (2.34; 95% CI 1.02 to 5.40). The OR tended to increase with decreasing ACCI scores in the partner 1 month prior to the death; a high OR was found for those who lost a partner with low ACCI scores (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.17), whereas no risk increase was found for those who lost a partner with high ACCI scores (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.53).
We found no difference in AF risk when we compared singles with cohabitating partners (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.01), nor if we excluded cases and corresponding controls who had redeemed a prescription for an antithrombotic agent (data not shown).
In this large population-based study, the severely stressful life event of losing a partner was associated with a transiently increased risk of AF, which lasted for about 1 year. The elevated risk was especially high for those who were young and those who lost a relatively healthy partner.
To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to examine the risk of AF after stressful life events, but an association has been suggested by case reports.9 A few studies have examined the relationship between psychological distress and AF, but the association remains unclear. The Women's Health Study from the US24 followed 30 746 women for a median of 125 months and identified 771 patients with AF. The study used the Mental Health Inventory-5 to measure global psychological distress, but no association with AF was revealed. As the American study included only few severely distressed study participants and did not take timing into account, an acute effect of severe stress may have been overlooked. In our study, the association between bereavement and AF was weak 1 year after the bereavement if at all present. A cohort study from Australia25 followed 226 patients for a median of 6 days after cardiac surgery and identified 56 patients who developed AF. They used the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales to measure self-reported postoperative stress, depression, and anxiety symptoms. Their findings showed that only anxiety was associated with higher risk of AF. The Australian study was, however, limited by small sample size. In addition, the results may not apply to the general population as the study was based on a highly selected group of individuals who had just undergone cardiac surgery.
Our study indicated that one of the most severe types of stress is associated with an increased risk of AF. We used the ACCI scores of the deceased partner 1 month before the death as a proxy for the expectedness of the death because we presume that the stress associated with bereavement is more severe if the loss is unexpected.26 We found that the highest risk was associated with the least predicted losses, while no association was found for more expected losses (ie, the partners with the highest ACCI scores). A long-lasting disease with great suffering and considerable care may be stressful and place high demands on the partner, and death may sometimes even be a relief. Cardiovascular disease, diabetes and male sex are well-known risk factors for AF.1 However, in our study, the OR of AF after bereavement did not differ much in the investigated subgroups during the 30-day period.
Bereavement is a major life event, which is known to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease,7 mental illness27 and death.28 The underlying causal mechanisms for the association between the loss of a partner and AF is unclear, but acute stress may possess direct arrhythmogenic properties by alternating autonomic control, influencing heart rate variability and enhancing proinflammatory cytokines.10–12 Animal studies have substantiated the importance of the neural component surrounding AF when manipulation of the autonomic pathways either promotes or eliminates AF.29 In addition, patients with paroxysmal AF often claim that emotional stress is a common triggering factor8 and increasing levels of perceived stress are associated with prevalent AF.30
The main strengths of our study include the population-based design and the large sample size, which allowed us to consider timing and study the association in high-risk populations. The case–control study was nested in a nationwide cohort and included all persons treated for inpatient incident AF in any Danish hospital during the study period. Denmark provides free access (tax-funded) to healthcare services for all residents, and the registration of AF is known to be valid (positive predictive value 92.6%).17 Controls were randomly selected from the underlying cohort using risk-set sampling. Thus, bias due to selection of study participants is an unlikely explanation for our findings. Since a precise day of onset is important in timing analysis, we only included persons with new onset of AF who were treated in hospitals as inpatients. We expect that the vast majority of these cases had an acute onset. Unfortunately, we do not have information on the diagnoses made in primary care in Denmark. However, the results were virtually unchanged when we excluded cases and corresponding controls who had redeemed a prescription of an antithrombotic agent before the index date. Information on the death of a partner was collected prospectively and did not rely on the memory of the study participants. Registration of death in the Danish Civil Registration System has a high validity and a completeness close to 100%, which implies that our assessment of death is accurate.15 In our study, the participants had to be married or cohabiting in order to be categorised as exposed to bereavement. This procedure is, however, unlikely to have introduced any bias as the results did not change much if we used only non-bereaved cohabitants as controls.
We adjusted for several confounding factors, such as medication and comorbid conditions, and found only little change in the estimates. However, residual confounding cannot be ruled out because we had no information on potential confounding factors such as lifestyle factors, physical activities and family history of AF. We believe that the risk of residual confounding is likely to be small as we cannot think of any possible confounder that could cause a transiently increased risk of AF shortly after bereavement. Adverse lifestyle factors (such as increased alcohol consumption, decreased sleep quality, poor diet and less physical activity)31 caused by the bereavement may be steps on the causal pathway from bereavement to AF1 and, therefore, should not be adjusted for.23
In conclusion, we found a transiently increased risk of AF after partner bereavement, especially if the loss was unpredicted according to the Charlson comorbidity index. Our results call for further studies aiming at evaluating whether the association also applies to more common, but less severe, stressors and at identifying causal mechanisms and treatment possibilities.
- Received November 20, 2015.
- Revision received January 15, 2016.
- Accepted January 19, 2016.
Contributors SG, BC, MF-G and MV designed the study. SG, HSP, MF-G and MV acquired the data. SG, HSP, JC, MF-G, BC, JL and MV analysed and interpreted the data. SG drafted the report. All authors approved the final draft.
Funding The study is supported by an unrestricted grant from the Lundbeck Foundation (grant number: R155-2012-11280).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement No additional data are available.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.