Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original research article
A cardiovascular disease policy model: part 2—preparing for economic evaluation and to assess health inequalities
  1. K D Lawson1,2,
  2. J D Lewsey1,
  3. I Ford3,
  4. K Fox4,
  5. L D Ritchie5,
  6. H Tunstall-Pedoe6,
  7. G C M Watt7,
  8. M Woodward8,9,
  9. S Kent1,
  10. M Neilson1 and
  11. A H Briggs1
  1. 1Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  2. 2Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  3. 3Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  4. 4BHF Centre for Research Excellence, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  5. 5Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  6. 6Institute of Cardiovascular Research, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
  7. 7General Practice & Primary Care, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  8. 8The George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  9. 9Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr KD Lawson; k.lawson{at}westernsydney.edu.au

Abstract

Objectives This is the second of the two papers introducing a cardiovascular disease (CVD) policy model. The first paper described the structure and statistical underpinning of the state-transition model, demonstrating how life expectancy estimates are generated for individuals defined by ASSIGN risk factors. This second paper describes how the model is prepared to undertake economic evaluation.

Design To generate quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), the Scottish Health Survey was used to estimate background morbidity (health utilities) and the impact of CVD events (utility decrements). The SF-6D algorithm generated utilities and decrements were modelled using ordinary least squares (OLS). To generate lifetime hospital costs, the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort (SHHEC) was linked to the Scottish morbidity and death records (SMR) to cost each continuous inpatient stay (CIS). OLS and restricted cubic splines estimated annual costs before and after each of the first four events. A Kaplan-Meier sample average (KMSA) estimator was then used to weight expected health-related quality of life and costs by the probability of survival.

Results The policy model predicts the change in QALE and lifetime hospital costs as a result of an intervention(s) modifying risk factors. Cost-effectiveness analysis and a full uncertainty analysis can be undertaken, including probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Notably, the impacts according to socioeconomic deprivation status can be made.

Conclusions The policy model can conduct cost-effectiveness analysis and decision analysis to inform approaches to primary prevention, including individually targeted and population interventions, and to assess impacts on health inequalities.

  • CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
  • QUALITY OF CARE AND OUTCOMES

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.