Objective To describe the evolution of clinical characteristics, in-hospital management and early outcome of elderly patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
Methods We analysed data from five consecutive Italian nationwide registries, conducted between 2001 and 2010, including patients with acute coronary syndromes admitted to cardiac care units (CCUs).
Results Of 10 983 patients with NSTEMI enrolled in the 5 surveys, 4350 (39.6%) were ≥75 years old (mean age 81±5 years). Some clinical characteristics such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, renal dysfunction and previous percutaneous coronary intervention increased significantly, whereas a history of stroke, myocardial infarction and heart failure decreased over time. An invasive approach increased from 26.6% in 2001 to 68.4% in 2010 (p<0.0001) and revascularisation rates increased from 9.9% to 51.7% (p<0.0001). Early use and prescription at discharge of β-blockers, statins and dual antiplatelet treatment increased significantly (p<0.0001). Thirty-day observed mortality decreased from 14.6% (95% CI 9.9 to 20.4) to 9.5% (95% CI 7.7 to 11.6). At the multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for baseline characteristics, compared with 2001, the risk of death was significantly lower in all the other studies performed at different times with reductions in adjusted mortality between 66% and 45%.
Conclusions Over the past decade, substantial changes have occurred in the clinical characteristics and management of elderly patients admitted with NSTEMI in Italian CCUs, with a greater use of revascularisation therapy and recommended medications. These variations have been associated with a reduction in 30-day adjusted mortality rate.
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
What is already known about this subject?
The elderly are a subgroup known to be at high risk; they are under-represented in guideline-generating clinical trials, and real-world registries continue to demonstrate less use of cardiac medications and invasive care, even among those who are likely to derive benefit.
What does this study add?
We demonstrated that substantial changes occurred in the clinical characteristics and management of elderly patients admitted with a diagnosis of NSTEMI over the past decade. These changes have been associated with a reduction in the adjusted early mortality rate.
How might this impact on clinical practice?
These data might encourage the use of recommended interventional and pharmacological strategies, including anti-thrombotic drugs during hospitalisation and life-saving therapies prescribed at discharge, in this high-risk population.
The management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has evolved over the past decade with the development of new therapeutics and strategies of care that have been shown to improve outcomes in clinical trials.1 ,2 However, the extent to which this new evidence is applied in clinical practice and whether such changes are associated with favourable outcomes requires continuous assessment, particularly in patients scarcely represented in large randomised studies. The elderly are a subgroup known to be at high risk; they are under-represented in guideline-generating clinical trials, and real-world registries continue to demonstrate less use of cardiac medications and invasive care, even among those who are likely to derive benefit.3 ,4 Within the whole spectrum of ACS, older patients admitted to cardiac care units (CCUs) present more frequently without ST-segment elevation3–6 and especially those with elevated biomarkers on admission seem to benefit from early invasive management.7 ,8
The aim of the present study was to describe the evolution of clinical characteristics, in-hospital management and early mortality of elderly patients admitted to CCUs with a diagnosis of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) by analysing data from nationwide Italian registries conducted between 2001 and 2010.
Five consecutive nationwide registries designed by the Italian Hospital Cardiology Association (ANMCO) on patients with ACS were conducted in Italy between 2001 and 2010: BLITZ in 2001,9 BLITZ-2 in 2003,10 IN-ACS OUTCOME (Italian Network on Acute Coronary Syndromes Outcome) in 2006–2007,11 BLITZ-4 in 2009 and 201012 and MANTRA (Management of patients with ACS in the real-world practice in Italy: an outcome research study focused on the use of ANTithRombotic Agents) in 2009–2010.13 All surveys included patients with ACS consecutively admitted alive to the participating CCUs during a prespecified period (few weeks for the BLITZ registries and 1 year for the IN-ACS OUTCOME and MANTRA registries; table 1). The methods used for each registry have been described previously.9–13 Briefly, their primary objectives were to evaluate the characteristics, management and outcomes of consecutive patients with ACS admitted to Italian CCUs, using a catchment broad enough to provide data representative of the entire country. Participation in the study was offered to all institutions, including university teaching hospitals, general and regional hospitals, and private clinics with CCUs receiving patients with ACS. Physicians were instructed that participation in the study should not affect clinical care or management.
All patients were informed of the nature and aims of the surveys and were asked to sign an informed consent form for the anonymous management of their individual data. Local Institutional Review Boards were informed of the study, according to the Italian rules.
For the present analysis, only patients aged ≥75 years presenting with elevated troponin and/or creatine kinase (CK)-MB fraction levels, and without persistent ST segment elevation and/or new onset Q waves or left-bundle branch block, were considered.
Data on baseline characteristics including demographics, risk factors and medical history were collected as previously described.9–13 Information on the use of cardiac procedures, including coronary angiography, type and timing of revascularisation therapy (if any), use of medications during hospitalisation and at hospital discharge, and in-hospital major clinical events, were recorded. In all surveys, clinical events were also assessed at 30 days.
Clinical reinfarction during initial hospitalisation was diagnosed in the presence of new ischaemic symptoms and a re-elevation of biochemical myocardial necrosis markers with or without concurrent ECG changes. In all studies, major bleeding was classified according to the thrombolysis in MI (TIMI) criteria.14 Heart failure was defined as the presence of signs and/or symptoms of pulmonary congestion in the absence of a non-cardiac cause. Stroke was identified as an acute neurological deficit that lasted >24 h and affected the ability to perform daily activities with or without confirmation by imaging techniques.
All data were collected using a case report form at the participating centres and entered in a centralised database located at the ANMCO Research Center in Florence. By using a validation plan, integrated in the data entry software, data were checked for missing or contradictory entries and values out of the normal range.
Categorical variables were reported as percentages and compared by χ2 test, whereas continuous variables were reported as means and SDs and compared by analysis of variance, if normally distributed, or by the Kruskal-Wallis test, if not. Temporal trends were tested using the Cochran-Armitage test for binary variables and the Kendall Tau rank correlation coefficient with the Jonckheere-Terpstra test for continuous variables. The 95% CIs of the difference of percentage changes were evaluated using the R package proCIs. Since the baseline patient characteristics showed significant changes in the five registries, we calculated a risk score for the 2010 MANTRA population using a logistic regression model resulting statistically significant at univariate analysis or considered of clinical interest. These variables included gender, age, diabetes, history of heart failure, prior stroke/transient ischaemic attacks (TIA), peripheral vascular disease, prior renal failure, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, Killip class and atrial fibrillation at admission. This score, evaluated on the 2010 MANTRA population, was also used to standardise the death rates for each of the previous surveys. The standardised death rates therefore represent the rates that would have been expected if the distribution of the baseline characteristics of each of the first four surveys had been similar to that of the most recent one.
Finally, a multivariate analysis (logistic model) was conducted to identify the independent predictors of use of coronary angiography during index hospitalisation; variables statistically significant at univariate analysis were also inserted in the model: gender, age, smoking habits, prior acute myocardial infarction (AMI), prior revascularisation, history of heart failure, prior stroke/TIA, prior renal failure, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, Killip class and atrial fibrillation at entry, admission to a hospital with catheterisation laboratory facilities, as well as study cohort (2001 as referral).
All tests were two-sided; a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted with SAS system software V.9.2 and with the ‘R’ Development Core Team 2012.
Of the 10 983 patients with NSTEMI enrolled in the five surveys, 4350 (39.6%) were ≥75 years old. The percentages of these patients enrolled in the individual studies are reported in table 1. The mean age of the populations included in the analysis was similar (p for trend=0.74). During this 10-year period, the rates of elderly patients with prior cerebrovascular accidents, history of angina, myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure declined, whereas the proportions of patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, renal dysfunction, previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and on β-blocker and statin therapy significantly increased (table 2).
The percentage of patients admitted to hospitals with catheterisation laboratory facilities increased substantially from 48% in 2001 to 71% in 2010 (percentage change 23 (95% CI 15 to 30)) and those undergoing coronary angiography at any time during index admission increased from 27% in 2001 to 68% in 2010 (percentage change, 42 (95% CI 35 to 48); figure 1), with a significant reduction in the time delay from hospital admission to angiography (figure 2). During the whole 10-year period, an invasive strategy was adopted in 74% of the patients admitted to hospitals with a catheterisation laboratory versus 42% of those admitted to hospitals without catheterisation laboratory (p<0.0001). At multivariate analysis, the presence of catheterisation laboratory was the strongest independent predictor of use of coronary angiography, followed by the year of the registry (the most recent being associated with higher probability). On the other hand, older age, haemodynamic deterioration (as identified by blood pressure, heart rate and Killip class), chronic kidney dysfunction and female gender were the strongest negative predictors of coronary angiography (figure 3).
Accordingly, the use of revascularisation therapy increased from 9.9% to 51.7% (percentage change from 2001 to 2010, 42 (95% CI 36 to 47)), with a more frequent use of PCI (9.4% to 47%; percentage change, 37 (95% CI 31 to 42)) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; 0.5–5.6%; percentage change, 5.1 (95% CI 2.5 to 6.9); figure 1). In general, among patients who underwent coronary angiography, myocardial revascularisation (PCI or CABG) was performed in 37% in 2001, 55% in 2003, 68% in 2006 and 75% in 2010 (p for trend <0.0001; percentage change from 2001 to 2010, 38 (95% CI 24 to 51)).
Antithrombotic medications used during hospitalisation changed markedly with increasing use of dual antiplatelet therapy from 17% in 2001 to 85% in 2010 (p for trend <0.0001; percentage change, 68 (95% CI 62 to 73)) and fondaparinux (15% in 2009 and 21% in 2010, p<0.0001; figure 4). On the other hand, the use of low-molecular-weight heparins (from 66% in 2001 to 48% in 2010, percentage change, −19 (95% CI −26 to −11)) decreased over the years. It is noteworthy that the use of unfractionated heparin (from 46% to 34%, percentage change, −12 (95% CI −20 to −4.3)), oral anticoagulation therapy (from 8.3% to 4.3%, percentage change, −4.0 (95% CI −8.9 to −0.5)) and intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (from 14% to 17%, percentage change, 3.1 (95% CI −2.9 to 8.1)) did not change significantly (figure 4). At the time of the studies, the use of bivalirudin in NSTEMI was very limited in Italy (0.6% in BLITZ 4, 2009).
The use of evidence-based treatments at discharge increased gradually over the 10-year period. Dual antiplatelet treatment was prescribed in 9.3% of elderly patients discharged alive in 2001 and 75% in 2010 (percentage change, 66 (95% CI 60 to 70)); β-blockers in 47% in 2001 and 71% in 2010 (percentage change, 24 (95% CI 16 to 32)); and statins in 37% in 2001 and 82% in 2010 (percentage change, 45 (95% CI 37 to 52); figure 5).
As shown in figure 2, the mean length of hospital stay decreased significantly over the 10-year period, and the percentage of patients directly discharged home decreased significantly from 87% in 2001 to 83% in 2003, 77% in 2006, 72% in 2009 and 78% in 2010 (p for trend=0.0006; percentage change from 2001 to 2010, −9.0 (95% CI −2.6 to −14.2)) in favour of transfers to rehabilitation or other structures.
The crude rates of in-hospital major clinical events, including death, heart failure, stroke and major bleeding, did not show a significant trend during the decade of analysis (table 3). However, the incidence of reinfarction (from 1.6% in 2001 to 3.0% in 2010, percentage change, 1.4 (95% CI −1.6 to 3.1)) showed an important difference between studies, though without a clear trend. At 30-day follow-up, the cumulative incidence of clinical events did not show any significant time trend over the 10-year period, despite remarkable differences in event rates between the studies (table 3).
Crude 30-day mortality decreased from 14.6% in 2001 to 9.5% in 2010 (percentage change, −5.1 (95% CI −11.0 to −0.3)), though without a statistically significant time trend (p=0.36). As shown in figure 6, when the death rates were standardised for the 2010 risk score (representing the expected rates, standardised on the risk distribution profile of 2010 MANTRA population), estimated mortality was fairly stable over time (8.9% in 2001, 7.8% in 2003, 8.8% in 2006, 9.7% in 2009 and 9.5% in 2010), but these were quite different from the observed rates (14.6%, 7.5%, 7.0%, 6.2% and 9.5%, respectively). Moreover, after multivariate adjustments for the differences in baseline characteristics, the risk of death was significantly lower in all of the registries as compared to BLITZ, with reductions in adjusted mortality of between 66% (BLITZ-4) and 45% (MANTRA).
The main findings of this study are as follows: (1) elderly patients account for approximately 40% of the NSTEMI population admitted to Italian CCUs and this proportion is increasing slightly over the years; (2) the clinical characteristics of elderly patients admitted to the CCUs in Italy have changed, with increasing rates of patients with diabetes, renal dysfunction and prior revascularisations; (3) the use of coronary angiography, myocardial revascularisation (mainly PCI) and adjunctive evidence-based therapies in this high-risk population has increased dramatically and (4) after adjustment for the changing baseline characteristics, these advances in care seem to be associated with a reduction in the rate of early mortality.
Although patients aged ≥75 years represent up to 40% of CCU admissions with NSTEACS, they account for only 10% of patients enrolled in clinical trials.15 Moreover, elderly patients with ACS in the community are at a higher disease-related risk than those randomised in trials and have more comorbidities.15 Indeed, during the 10-year period of our analysis, the rate of elderly patients with traditional risk factors such as previous cerebrovascular accident, history of angina, MI and heart failure declined, suggesting more effective preventive strategies and/or favourable impact of previous revascularisations. On the other hand, the number of elderly patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and renal dysfunction increased consistently, suggesting a growing availability of the CCU cardiologist to treat this complex population aggressively.
Lack of randomised clinical trial data to guide acute care in elderly patients and in patients with comorbidities might explain the lower use of evidence-based therapies among elderly patients with ACS.3 ,4 The Euro Heart survey, an international cohort study including patients with ACS from 25 European countries, showed that elderly patients were less intensively treated than younger patients and had a higher in-hospital mortality.4 Nevertheless, patients ≥75 years old seem to benefit from potent adjunctive evidence-based therapies together with an early invasive approach, particularly those with ST elevation MI (STEMI) or NSTEACS with elevated biomarkers.7 ,16 ,17 In the Italian Elderly ACS study, the first randomised trial comparing treatment strategies in elderly patients with NSTEACS, patients with elevated troponin levels on admission randomised to an early aggressive approach had a significant 57% reduction in the rate of the primary end point (a composite of ischaemic and bleeding events) at 1 year.7 In the present analysis, the remarkable increase over time in the use of life-saving pharmacological therapies, coronary angiography and PCI as revascularisation modality was not paralleled by a significant trend towards the reduction of 30-day mortality, which, however, became evident, and statistically highly significant after adjustment for other powerful predictors of death such as diabetes, chronic kidney dysfunction,18 ,19 and markers of ventricular dysfunction such as prior heart failure, low blood pressure, high baseline heart rate and Killip class.
A further possible explanation for comparable crude mortality rates recorded after the year 2003 is the short-term follow-up available in our surveys. In another registry that showed a significant increase in the use of guidelines-recommended treatments including PCI among more than 900 elderly patients admitted for MI between 2000 and 2006, a difference in mortality at 1 month was evident in case of STEMI, whereas there was only a non-significant trend towards reduction in mortality in patients with NSTEMI, despite a fourfold increase in the rate of invasive strategy during index admission.20 Indeed, in the pivotal randomised clinical trials comparing an early invasive and an initially conservative treatment in NSTEACS, the clinical benefit in terms of death and/or MI after an invasive strategy in NSTEACS are usually observed after 6 months to 1 year of admission.8 ,21 This is particularly evident in some patient populations with ACS, such as the elderly, in whom most deaths have a cardiac ischaemic origin, and the higher risk rises from 30 days to 1 year, especially after revascularisation.22 Accordingly, the 5-year follow-up from the RITA-3 trial demonstrated that the benefit of invasive treatment over conservative care continued to widen after the first year, demonstrating the greatest benefits in those in high-risk quartiles, with age being the strongest predictor of risk.23
Beyond mortality, all other outcomes did not present a significant trend over the decade, both during hospitalisation and at 30-day follow-up, with the exception of an increase in reinfarction during hospital stay, probably due to more accurate and sensitive diagnostic methods that have been recently developed. In this regard, it should be appreciated that the increasing accuracy of detecting NSTEMI developed over the years may have led to a selection of patients at lower risk and could partially explain the reduction in the rate of adverse events observed in our series.
Increased age is associated with an increased risk of drug-related adverse events, such as bleeding, frequently caused by excess dosing of antithrombolytic drugs.24 At variance with previous reports showing a high risk of major bleeding in elderly patients treated invasively (eg, 17% of patients ≥75 years of age in the invasive arm of the TACTICS TIMI-18 trial),14 ,15 the cumulative rate of major bleeding remained consistently low over time (approximately 2% at 1 month) in the Italian registries reported in this study, and consistently with the results of the recent Italian Elderly ACS study.7 This finding is most likely attributable to the moderate use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, with a selective and decreasing use of low-molecular-weight heparin and with increasing use of the radial approach to PCI that accounts for approximately 35% in recent registries and as high as 70% in high-volume centres.7
There are some limitations to our analysis. Although every effort was made in each survey to capture the greatest possible proportion of hospitals with CCU in the entire country, the ratio between the invited and participating centres varies across registries from 0.7 to 0.3. However, the geographical distribution and the availability of facilities of CCUs participating in different registries may be considered representative of the entire country. The duration of the surveys, clinical end points and programmed follow-up visits were not homogeneous. The short duration of follow-up (1 month) might have led to an underestimation of the benefits of implementation of care in terms of clinical events. In addition, the lack of central event adjudication might have amended the actual rate of adverse clinical outcomes.
We did not record specific contraindications to any medication; in an elderly population, this may have influenced the rate of use of certain drugs, and may have been an unrecognised confounder, but we would not expect the prevalence of contraindications to specific therapies, particularly antithrombotic therapies, to change markedly with time. In addition, we did not collect some variables such as frailty and functional status that are particularly important in elderly patients. Finally, analysing only patients admitted to CCUs may imply a selection bias.
In the past decade, substantial changes have occurred in the clinical characteristics and management of elderly patients admitted with a diagnosis of NSTEMI in Italian CCUs. We observed a marked increase in the use of recommended interventional and pharmacological strategies, including antithrombotic drugs used during hospitalisation and life-saving therapies prescribed at discharge, and these changes have been associated with a reduction in the adjusted early mortality rate.
The authors thank all the patients and investigators from all participating centres of the studies, as well as dedicated staff from the ANMCO Research Center.
Contributors DL and SS participated in the conception, design and conduct of the studies’ analysis, drafted and revised the paper. DL and LG statistically analysed the data and revised the final manuscript. ZO, FC, AB and GDP were the principal investigators of the individual studies and made a critical revision of the final manuscript. LB, ADC, GC and FMB made a critical revision of the final manuscript.
Funding The studies included in this manuscript were funded by unrestricted grants as follows: BLITZ (Boehringer Ingelheim, Italy), BLITZ-2 (Merck, Sharp&Dohme, Italy), IN-ACS Outcome (Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb, Italy), BLITZ-4 (Merck, Sharp&Dohme, Italy) and MANTRA (Glaxo SmithKline, Italy). The sponsor of the studies was the Heart Care Foundation, a non-profit independent institution which is also the owner of the databases. Database management and quality control of the data were under the responsibility of the Research Centre of the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO). The Steering Committees of the studies had full access to all of the data in the studies and take complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Competing interests DL and LG, employees of Heart Care Foundation which conducted the studies, report Institutional grants from Glaxo SmithKline, Italy and grants from Merck, Sharp&Dohme, Italy outside the submitted work. SS reports grants and personal fees from ELI LILLY, grants from NOVARTIS, grants and personal fees from IROKO, and personal fees from DAIICHI SANKYO, ROCHE, BAYER and ASTRA ZENECA outside the submitted work.
Ethics approval Local Italian Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement No additional data are available.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.