Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original research article
Specialist intervention is associated with improved patient outcomes in patients with decompensated heart failure: evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary inpatient heart failure team
  1. Jayne Masters1,
  2. Geraint Morton2,
  3. Isabel Anton3,
  4. Jane Szymanski1,
  5. Elizabeth Greenwood1,
  6. Joanna Grogono4,
  7. Andrew S Flett1,
  8. John G F Cleland5 and
  9. Peter J Cowburn1
  1. 1 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
  2. 2 Department of Cardiology, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
  3. 3 Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Jorge, Zaragoza, Spain
  4. 4 Department of Cardiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
  5. 5 Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Geraint Morton; geraintmorton{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objective The study aimed to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary inpatient heart failure team (HFT) on treatment, hospital readmissions and mortality of patients with decompensated heart failure (HF).

Methods A retrospective service evaluation was undertaken in a UK tertiary centre university hospital comparing 196 patients admitted with HF in the 6 months prior to the introduction of the HFT (pre-HFT) with all 211 patients seen by the HFT (post-HFT) during its first operational year.

Results There were no significant differences in patient baseline characteristics between the groups. Inpatient mortality (22% pre-HFT vs 6% post-HFT; p<0.0001) and 1-year mortality (43% pre-HFT vs 27% post-HFT; p=0.001) were significantly lower in the post-HFT cohort. Post-HFT patients were significantly more likely to be discharged on loop diuretics (84% vs 98%; p=<0.0001), ACE inhibitors (65% vs 76%; p=0.02), ACE inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (83% vs 91%; p=0.02), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (44% vs 68%; p<0.0001) pre-HFT versus post-HFT, respectively. There was no difference in discharge prescription rates of beta-blockers (59% pre-HFT vs 63% post-HFT; p=0.45).

The mean length of stay (17±19 days pre-HFT vs 19±18 days post-HFT; p=0.06), 1-year all-cause readmission rates (46% pre-HFT vs 47% post-HFT; p=0.82) and HF readmission rates (28% pre-HFT vs 20% post-HFT; p=0.09) were not different between the groups.

Conclusions The introduction of a specialist inpatient HFT was associated with improved patient outcome. Inpatient and 1-year mortality were significantly reduced. Improved use of evidence-based drug therapies, more intensive diuretic use and multidisciplinary care may contribute to these differences in outcome.

  • Heart failure
  • Multidisciplinary Team

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors JM designed the study, analysed and interpreted the data and critically revised the manuscript. GM assisted with study design, analysed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. IA, JS, EG, JG, ASF helped acquire and analyse the data and critically revised the manuscript. JGFC analysed the data and critically revised the manuscript. PJC designed the study protocol, analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. PJC is responsible for the overall content as guarantor.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No additional data available.